Okay, I'm sick of this, someone please ban "tyler.durden"
For reasons why I will include my answers to his previous post.
Just cos you say you look for the thread and say you summarise this doesn't mean that it is true.
Umm... Yes it does, he summarised what real people/customers had voted for and their opinions on the matter, the only way that that doesn't make it true is if you are stating that all 27 pages of this thread were generated by fake posters. Please prove me wrong as I am dying to hear your logic on this matter
Why should i believe your statement as true.
Don't try to present this as facts.
See above statement
You say more people gave reasons for change.
That is bullcrap.
Count the votes yourself and see what numbers you come up with, hopefully for us you haven't previously worked for the Florida election vote counting committee sometime close to before George W. Bush got elected.
Most people reasons are :
Yeap change it.
Or I like.
I see it is beneficial for me in the future.
If you called these as reasons.
Then you need to get your head straight.
So if someone votes but doesn't have a valid reason then that vote should be ignored? We dont live in a communist society. Welcome to democracy, enjoy your stay, my friend.
Also you forget that by putting the change to 2am
this means we need to leave the computer on for 2 hours idling, doing nothing.
This means more $ cost in electricity for us, and more earlier wear and tear of the machines.
Now you're really clutching at straws. I leave my computers
on all day every day, they get turned off for minutes at a time when they need a reset because of updates etc, if you have a computer that dies within a couple of years at least, from the type of activity you describe then I suggest you buy your computer(s) from a more reputable builder. End of story.
Also someone who stated that most people are awake between 12am-2am so it shouldn't be a problem.
Yeah those are probably unemployed or whatever.
Most people who have work or school don't or can't stay up to 2am.
One thing you need to realise is that everyone is not you
and you are not everyone.
I have employees that work various 8 hour shifts that range from starting at 9am, 10am, 11am and 12 midday, they are not unemployed or "whatever" (as you desccribe", in fact, they probably earn more money than you, in saying that, do they not deserve to stay up until 2am browsing the web or playing games or whatever they want to do with their internet connection to it's full capacity without other people's scheduled downloads affecting their connection? I think so.
You can browse during the day.
For gamers, why not just game earlier.
Refer back to the previous comment I made about shift workers, not everyone works 9 to 5 days.
I think this would benefit 2 out of 10 ppl.
While it would inconvenience 8.
Feel free to think what you will but the statistics of this thread indicate otherwise. (as documented by CoreyPlover, thankyou CoreyPlover, I was wondering what the count was)
If this change is force on us,
I know many people would look for a new ISP.
People were already pissed by the $3 fee.
Now this is a kick in the teeth.
Good riddance and good luck finding another ISP that offers as good a service and also the opportunity for customers to voice their opinions on upcoming proposed changes.